expr:class='"loading" + data:blog.mobileClass'>

Sunday, October 16, 2016

"Political Correctness" Is Not All Bad




63967512.jpg (400×400)



Labeling something as "politically correct" appears to be a popular conservative put-down of almost any opinion contrary to their own. In their lexicon, if one is "politically correct," she/he is soft, weak or fearful of calling "a spade a spade"(pun intended).

Donald Trump has said: "I don't have time for political correctness."  Many have argued that political correctness is the "tyranny of manners," and others say it muzzles free speech.

In light of the rhetoric surrounding this year's presidential elections, I would like to make a case for discerning speech, i.e, what is frequently disparaged as "political correctness."

First, I am not advocating that "political correctness" should interfere with someone's free speech, but I am suggesting that the manner in which one expresses their thoughts should be within the constraints of civility. I think any serious adult can make their point without using words like homo, bitch, or retard, especially if these terms are directed at another person. These terms are even unacceptable on junior high playgrounds.

Referring to women or their body parts with the p-word or the c-word is beyond the realm of common decency and should not be tolerated. Using the f-word or n-word is wrong for many reasons other than an issue of "political correctness."

usa-election_debate2.jpg (664×441)
However, the term, "political correctness, " is in itself a caricature promoted by those who wallow in racist, sexist, and xenophobic diatribes. What is at issue is not political at all; it is about common decency and civility -- two values that have been thrown under the bus in 2016. In the most recent "town hall" debate, even the body language exhibited disturbing signs of inappropriate stalking. Who would have considered a candidate from a major political party would graphically boast about sexual assault?

The 2016 presidential election cycle is unique in many ways; and although it may influence future campaigns, I hope that the lack of civility will be proven to be an unacceptable tactic.

I long for the days of cultured conservatives like William F. Buckley who could attack an opponent without resorting to vulgarity and name-calling. "I would take you seriously, but to do so would affront my intelligence."









No comments: