GOP Candidates: "These Debates Are Too Hard."

The present crop of Republican presidential candidates continues to amaze. Now they are telling us they want to change the GOP debates because they don't like answering difficult questions. They want:
1. friendly interrogators who will give them softball questions, 
2. they want the length of the debate limited to 2 hours, 
3. they want the temperature lowered so they do not perspire, 
4. they want rock-star green rooms prior to the debate
5. no questions about things like foreign policy
In other words, they don't want a debate, but have a platform for each candidate to do a free campaign commercial.

Most of their campaigns are based on fear, but who would have guessed they were afraid of an independent media. Since in the past they have "waged war" on whatever they fear, we will now  be witnessing a "war on the media." And, if that's not enough, one of the candidates, Donald Trump, wants to get paid for participating.

If you're thinking a debate such as they are asking for would be so boring no one would watch, I would agree.;but this could be a lot of fun if the candidates asked each other questions. Talk about a cat fight. Their debates would have the same appeal as a World Wrestling Federation match and would attract the same audience. And, in my opinion, they should, like wrestlers, be paid for their performances.

On a more serious note, one has to wonder how these candidates would be able to handle the presidency if they have trouble with a few hours of tough questions from independent journalists. The questions and decisions become much more so in the Oval Office.

Jeb's Really Cool Things to Do - Eating Nails?

Presidential candidate, Jeb Bush, complained recently, "I have a lot of really cool things that I can do" other than run for president.

 It's difficult for me to imagine Jeb doing anything "really cool," but then his  concept of "really cool" is probably different from mine. In a previous post, I suggested that he would probably not consider working for Habitat for Humanity as "really cool."

Let's look at some "really cool things" he might consider:

1. make more money -- pretty easy to do when you are born into wealth.

2. remind your Brother, George W, that he owes you since you, as Florida governor, stole the 2000 election and put him in the White house.


3.buy some "really cool" cowboy boots to add to his collection, although he has never worked on a ranch or farm.

4. hire a ghost writer to write his "autobiography," just like big brother, George W. Bush.

5. go to work for Fox News and try to revise history by convincing viewers that George's Iraq Invasion was a good idea.

6. follow George's retirement plan , take art classes, and paint nude portraits of yourself.

7. spend more time playing fantasy football since he already bragged in the last debate  how well his "team" was doing..

8. hang out with his "Swift Boat Veterans" and congratulate them once again for lying about John Kerry in 2004. Of course they can't share war stories because Jeb was never in the military and the only battlefield the "veterans" saw was the Alamo memorial.

9. explain his illegal and unconstitutional interference as governor in the Terri Sciavo case.

10. swim in the St.John's River, "Florida's American Heritage River," and deny that the Koch brothers' Georgia Pacific plant is daily dumping millions of gallons of toxic waste into the river.

11. study the Bush family genealogy, but then he might learn his grandfather, Prescott Bush, financially profited from his involvement with the architects of Nazism.

12. become, like so many former elected officials, a high-paid lobbyist  and use his contacts and networks to influence legislation in favor of his wealthy clients.

13. work for a gun manufacturer or the NRA,since he was the genius who gave Florida "Stand Your Ground" legislation.

Most recently Jeb has assured us he "eats nails for breakfast," I'm presuming he considers that a "really cool thing" to do. In that case, I have nothing to offer, except maybe milk and sugar.

GOP Loves Prestige and Power; Hates Work

Teddy Roosevelt

Not that long ago, politicians considered themselves "public servants" with a responsibility to serve "the public good," not royalty or corporate lackeys.

Unfortunately today's politicians (and to be honest, most of them are Republicans) seek the prestige and power of elected office, not to serve the public interest, but the good of their contributors and lobbyists. Then they have the nerve to tell us they don't really want to work at the job they are being paid to do.

On the other hand, there is the example of Theodore Roosevelt, also a Republican,.He never complained about the effort and sacrifices required to do his job. He relished the role of serving his country and the public good. He was a fighter who embraced the struggle.

Perhaps the present GOP attitude toward public service began with Ronald Reagan. By all accounts he slept through cabinet meetings and did not want to be bothered by the day-to-day requirements of being President. Thus we ended up secretly selling weapons to Iran to finance illegal activities in Nicaragua. Of course, this "see-nothing, know nothing" approach saved Reagan from being impeached. The lower level operatives took the fall for this duplicitous debacle. They took "one for the Gipper."

Today we are seeing the same sort of aversion to doing one's job on the part of some  GOP politicians.

Rubio, Ryan, Jeb Bush

The first case is Jeb Bush's recent whining about how difficult it is to get the GOP nomination He apparently thought he was entitled to nomination by virtue of being part of the "Bush Dynasty." He was surprised the nomination wasn't handed to him on a silver platter. He felt entitled based on some old European concept of royal inheritance. Having to work for it was an alien concept.

In a recent interview in South Carolina, Mr. Bush complained, "I've got a lot of really cool things I could do other than sit around, being miserable, listening to people demonize me and me feeling compelled to demonize them. That is a joke. Elect Trump if you want that." Certainly does not sound like Teddy Roosevelt who would immerse himself in the fight.

And as an aside, I would be interested in what "the really cool things" Jeb wants to do are. I doubt that he is thinking about working for Habitat for Humanity or volunteering in a homeless shelter. I suspect, he is thinking "cool things" like hunting and fishing.

Mr. Bush, by the way, who dislikes the work required to gain the nomination is the candidate who told Americans they need to work "longer hours."

And then there is Senator Marco Rubio, who also wants to be President. He wants to fire federal workers for not working hard enough. It so happens that Mr. Rubio has a problem doing his job. This year he missed  1/3 (99) of he votes in the Senate, but continued to take his salary. He has the distinction of having the worst Senate voting record this year. In addition, he has told his friends that he "hates" the job he campaigned for. If he can't handle this job, why should he be given a more difficult job? Someone should remind him that public service takes hard work 

Another guy who has trouble with working is Paul Ryan, the new Speaker of the House, the 3rd most important position in our government. He replaced John Boehner who was famous for leaving the office early. Mr. Ryan is, perhaps, the first Speaker in US history who took  the office after telling us he did not want to work too hard. He informed his colleagues that he would only put in the hours of "a normal day" -- no late nights or weekends.

Mr. Ryan did have a noble reason for his reluctance to work overtime; he wanted to spend more time with his family. Some cynics, on the other hand, suggest he wants the extra time to pursue his "deer-hunting life style." It will be interesting to see whether he attends the next State of the Union speech, as it occurs in the evening after his "normal work day."

Face it, serving one's country as an elected public servant is hard work. (Have you noticed that those who consider themselves privileged and entitled never use the term "public servant"?)


Although Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, do not want to work too hard, they are opposed to raising the minimum wage. Today young mothers and fathers earning the current minimum wage can't possibly support their families by working a "normal work day." They need to work extra hours or work two jobs to make ends meet. Apparently family time is only for the privileged and entitled.

Unfortunately, this country will not continue as a successful democracy if this attitude of entitlement and lack of total commitment permeates our political process. It didn't work out too well for the Roman Empire and it will not work for us.

Derelict Politicians.

It can be argued that politicians who do nothing to keep guns from the hands of mentally ill citizens have blood on their hands. Interestingly enough, those same politicians are frequently the same ones who are reluctant to spend money on mental health. As I recall, they swore on a bible to promote the "general welfare." They have failed to do their job.

Blogger: Blogger Dashboard

Blogger: Blogger Dashboard

Party of Fear and Hatred

The Republican Party in the US has produced some of our great presidents, beginning with Abraham Lincoln and featuring Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower.  One characteristic of the three is that they were fearless and brave.  Lincoln paid for it with his life. Teddy Roosevelt was a fighter in every sense of the word. And Ike was considered one of our our best military leaders.These were men who moved forward fearlessly.

And now we have the Republican Party of today -- a group of men and some women who are falling back in retreat because they are consumed with fear. They fear science, the future, universal education, voting rights, Islam, our own government, and any form of  "otherness."

They are also afraid of people: Muslims, immigrants, gays, black, brown and Asian people, any minority, transsexuals, feminists, union members, President Obama, and Pope Francis.

The current GOP has so many phobias, it should be hospitalized.

And the thing about fearful people is that if they fear something or someone, they want to convince the rest of us to be terrorized as well. They literally preach fear. That's how we ended up invading Iraq. Dubya, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the neo-cons set up an incessant chant of fear, fear of WMDs, Saddam's secret nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, and the presence of al-Qaeda  terrorists in Iraq. All fear-mongering lies.

When president Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 said,  "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,"  he was wisely warning us of the disastrous results of fear-driven policies.

The knee-jerk reaction of the Bush administration after the 9/11 attacks is typical of the mistakes made as a result of fear. Attorney General Ashcroft and the administration convinced Congress to pass the so-called "Patriot Act" which sacrificed various of our civil liberties in the name of fighting terrorists. One might conclude that Osama bin Laden won that one, he scared us into giving up some of our cherished rights. Hopefully our nation will continue to walk back some of the most egregious excesses of that ill-advised, fear-driven legislation.

In our current situation, almost every Republican politician is opposed to President Obama's Iranian Nuclear Treaty, and although our nuclear scientists and military experts support the treaty, the GOP fears Barrack Obama will receive credit for for making peace instead of war. Perhaps that kind of political fear is the most sinister; it keeps politicians from acting in the best interests of our country.

Another detrimental aspect of fear is that it generates anger and hatred. It is no coincidence that, within the last eight years, the number of hate groups in this country has reached historic highs.  If a major political party and a major television news organization continues to promote fear, those who drink the fear Kool-Aid will become angry at all those "others" who are not white and do not attend the "right' churches.

When John Kennedy was campaigning for president, Southern Baptists, among others,  claimed that a Catholic could not be president. Today presidential candidate Ben Carson and other Republicans are so fearful of Islam that they tell us a Muslim should never be elected president. Apparently these fear-mongers have not read the Constitution which rules out any such religious litmus test.  It seems that Islam-phobia is part and parcel of the current GOP, and such fear generates hated, and, in the minds of some followers, that excuses violence. Not what our country needs.

Within  the cacophonous circus that is the current Republican Party, there must be be a potential fearless leader in the mold of Lincoln, Roosevelt, or Eisenhower. Let's hope she or he steps forward soon and begins advocating for building peace rather than walls and fences..

Hilton Head's Bay Tanner Does It Again

The 13th Bay Tanner mystery by Kathryn R. Wall has all those elements her fans have come to expect and enjoy: a good mystery, an interesting main character in the person of Bay Tanner, a strong supporting cast ( Livinia, a black woman whom Bay treats as her "mother;" husband, Red; and Erik Whiteside, Bay's business partner and IT guru) and the colorful description of the Hilton Head setting.

Although Bay Tanner has always been a strong, independent woman, in this latest book she has become a little more edgy and less tolerant of people's "bull shit." And, as in the past, her relationship with her husband, Red, is loving but at times strained as they both have "a mind of their own."

In this mystery, after a period of avoiding dangerous cases, Bay meets Pudge, one of her old high school friends. She  hires Bay to investigate what she suspects to be a case of domestic abuse. In short, she thinks another of their old friends is being used as a punching bag by her arrogant husband. But, at that point, the abusive husband disappears under mysterious circumstances,  Many, including the Sheriff's department, conclude that the wife, nicknamed Scarlett, had had enough and offed the guy.

Kathryn R. Wall

If you are a fan of Kathy Wall, you know that not everything is as it seems, and from there on things become interesting.

Those readers who have followed this series will notice that Mangiamo's seems to have replaced Jump and Phil's as the restaurant of choice for Bay and Red.

One also is left with the impression that Jordan Point may be the last Bay Tanner mystery; let's hope that is not the case.

Pope Nails It

"An unfettered pursuit of money rules.

       That is the dung of the devil."

Political Campaign Paraphanalia.

I, 

The campaign of 2016 has begun. What fun. Rand Paul takes a chain saw to the Federal tax code; Lindsey Graham alternately sets his cell phone on fire and hits it with a baseball bat. Donald Trump is saying stupid things and his Republican opponents, for the most part, do not object because they don't want to offend Donald's "people." Depending on how you count, there are 16 to 20 GOP candidates and at least five Democrats competing for our attention. I'll bet the Founding Fathers had no idea what kind of circus they were creating. 

Not only is the country's TV industry salivating at all the money these people will pay to tell lies about each other, but these days each candidate has her/his own set of merchandise to sell to  loyal followers. Hillary Clinton is selling everything from t-shirts to bottle openers and  spatulas -- all emblazoned with her "H."  While Jeb Bush is selling  campaign buttons, bumper stickers, and car magnets, none of which mention the name, "Bush." An interesting omission.

Ted Cruz (R-Texas) appears to hold the lead in terms of negative slogans on T-shirts and bumper stickers. He sells the obligatory "Stop Hillary 2016" button and a T-shirt that says: "Stop the Battle Axe (photo of Hillary) with a CRUZ Missile (photo of Ted)." For his Texas wingnuts he sells a button challenging: "Come and Take It. God and Guns Since 1776." (I wonder how God feels about being used this way.) And for the Tea Party crowd,there is a car magnet featuring a coiled snake with Ted's head and the phrase: "Don't Tread on Ted." I presume the implication is that he will bite your ankle and infect you with his venom.

In contrast,  Lincoln Chaffee has just a few items (I presume they are in metric sizes), but who can resist the slogan: "Lincoln for President."

 On the other hand, I  have in mind another array of T-shirts and buttons that are not yet for sale;

"I'm Dubya's Smarter Brother"  Jeb Bush
"I Slept with Bill Clinton" Hillary
"I'm Bought and Paid For"  Scott Walker
"Christians Rule" Rick Santorum
"Indicted Today, President Tomorrow" Rick Perry

"Work Longer Hours, You Lowlifes" Jeb Bush
"We Are the Party of Stupid" Bobby Jindal
"Apostle Huck is Your Savior" Mike Huckabee
"Keep'em Out!" Donny Trump
"Get on My Bus or Be Run Over" John Kasich

"Rumpled is In" Bernie Sanders
"I Left the Party of Stupid" Lincoln Chaffee
"Please Look at Me." Donny Trump
"Irish Should Apply" Martin O'Malley
"Let's Shut Down the Govt. Again" Ted Cruz

"No Such Thing as Marital Rape" The Donald Trump
"Close That Bridge" Chris Christie
"Fired by HP" Carly Fiorina
"Me and My Dark Money" Scott Walker
"I Spread Misinformation" Rand Paul
"I Don't Have Time for Senate Roll Calls" Marco Rubio*

The quadrennial political circus is back. Get a beverage of your choice, pull up a chair, and watch adults revert to their junior high school personas. 

*Marco is against Paid Leave, but was absent for 1/3 of Senate votes. 

"I Want My Country Back" Is Back

Bumper Sticker

After the recent controversy surrounding the use of the Confederate Flag, a racist and conservative element has intensified a propaganda campaign under the banner, "I Want My Country Back," featuring bumper stickers because they are not too good at writing complete sentences.

The slogan has a patriotic and nostalgic ring to it, but it also suggests that "someone" -- a malevolent ogre, perhaps -- has stolen the country. We are apparently invited to fill in the name of the villain or villains. The promoters probably want you to fill in the blank with one of the following: President Obama, liberals, Latino immigrants, atheists, gays/lesbians, evolutionists, socialists, Muslims, environmentalists, intellectuals, or that whole unwashed conglomerate known as "non-Christian."

It is inconceivable to these people that someone would have the temerity to suggest that the country was stolen by: the NRA, the Tea Party, white supremacists, the religious bigots, the creationists, big oil, big coal, Wall Street oligarchs, or radical Christians.

Then there is the question who the "I" is in the slogan. It would have two different interpretations for a Donald Trump or a Bernie Sanders.

Ignoring the lack of clarity in such a bumper sticker, the most important question becomes: What country do they want back? a country that:

• practices slavery
• allows lynchings
• steals lands from Native Americans
• allows only white landowners to vote
• allows racial segregation
• ignores domestic violence?

If that indeed is the country they wish to take back, most Americans are thankful that "country" is a thing of the past.

Although some may wish for that kind of country; others of their ilk probably are hoping to take back a country that has no:

•  civil rights legislation
•  labor laws
•  voting rights act
•  national parks
•  Internal Revenue Service
•  Department of Energy
•  Department of Education 
•  Food and Drug Administration
•  Department of Housing and Urban Development  
•  Justice Department.

But the country they really want back is a country without:

• The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)
• Social Security
• Medicare and Medicaid

An almost hysterical fear of socialism has led these people and their politicians to spend their time and treasure trying to dismantle what so many have given their lives to build and protect. 

No matter how desperately these people would like to go backwards, the continued success of this country depends on going forward in a continuing effort to build an egalitarian, just, and compassionate society which exercises wise stewardship of our limited resources.

The Tyranny and Intolerance of Religious Fumdamentalists

Why is it that religious fundamentalists, whatever the religion, are not happy having the freedom to follow their religious dictates , but feel compelled to impose those dictates on the rest of us?

This tendency raised its ugly un-American head most recently following the Supreme Court's  decision declaring gay couples have the right to marry (Obergefell v. Hodges). Fundamentalist Christians   were outraged. Some government officials said they would refuse to issue marriage licenses to gay couples because it was contrary to their personal religious beliefs. Some business owners proclaimed that they would not sell flowers, cakes or whatever for gay marriage. A conservative Catholic organization (catholicvote.org) used their money to produce a hateful anti-gay marriage commercial.

Why all this furor and fear?  No one is forcing Rick Santorum to marry another man. No one is forcing a Christian to attend a lesbian wedding. No one is attacking the marriage of a good Baptist man and woman.Why do they feel threatened?

The apparent answer is that they want to impose their religious convictions on the rest of us. If they believe same-sex marriage is an abomination, they want to mount a crusade to make the rest of us conform to that belief.

 If fundamentalists believe the biblical creation account, they want our common public schools to teach their version. If some Catholic bishops believe contraception is a sin, they  want to impose that belief on employees and deny them access to medical contraceptives. If fundamentalist Muslims believe  that Sharia law is the path to everlasting glory, they want Sharia Law to replace civil law. I'm guessing here, but I suspect Jewish fundamentalists believe that all males should be circumcised. Other fundamentalist religions believe young women should be circumcised.

In addition to the attempts of fundamentalists and their GOP puppet politicians to impose their beliefs on the rest of us, they are also intolerant of the religious beliefs of others. The most arrogant example of intolerance is the claim that the United States is "a Christian Nation." Although it may be true that a majority of US citizens claim to be Christian, that fact does not make our country a "Christian Nation."  Unless our Constitution is replaced, our country will never be a Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or Mormon nation.

In case there was any doubt about that, in 1797 President John Adams submitted the Treaty of Tripoli to the US Senate which unanimously approved it.  The treaty reassured the world that "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."

The beauty of the United States and its Constitution is that the government will not tell you what to believe, but by the same token you must tolerate your neighbor's beliefs.

Buck Blasts Fireworks

My friend , Buck, decided we should meet on Saturday, the 4th of July, instead of our regular Wednesday breakfast. Very patriotic, I thought. We met at Nick's Diner, and asked Sara to take us to our favorite table -- the one in the back corner, the one Nick chose for us because he didn't want his customers to be distracted by our arguments.

As we took our seats, I wished Buck a Happy Fourth. "What's so happy about it it?' he snapped. It was going to be one of those meals.

"Today, 239 years ago," (I was trying to impress him with my math) "we declared our independence and we are still free. A great day."

"You do know the Declaration of Independence wasn't signed until August 2nd, don't you?" he asked somewhat sarcastically.

"Fine," I said. "What's your problem? Did Michigan fire Jim Harbaugh?  Is Pope Francis too Christian? No wait, I got it. You're upset that the Supreme Court legalized gay/lesbian marriage. That's it, admit it. You were sure your Republicans had stacked the Court."

'Give me a break," he said. "I could care less whether men can legally marry men. Nobody is forcing me to marry a man, so why would I  care? I prefer to marry women and I will continue to do so."

At that point, Sara appeared with our coffee, and Buck said he wanted to ask her an important question. "Would you," he said in a pleading voice, "be my next wife?'

"What? Did you kill your wife?' she asked.

"Just preparing for the future. And reassuring my friend here that I'm never going to marry a man."

"Oh, okay, just fax me your financials, and I'll let you know."

As Sara left, I asked, "Okay, what is your problem?"  

"The damn Fourth of July! That's my problem."

"That's unpatriotic and sacrilegious. I will have to turn you in to Homeland Security. Maybe they can revoke your citizenship."

"I'll tell you what's sacrilegious. It's the damn fireworks and marching bands. Particularly the fireworks. John Adams had many good ideas, but telling Americans to shoot off fireworks on the 4th of July was his worst."

Bewildered, I said, "You are unbelievable. What is wrong  with fireworks? I look forward to seeing a beautiful fireworks display. It's a fine art,  albeit temporary."

"Balderdash. There's nothing fine about it. For one thing it's a big waste of money. I read Americans spent $967 million on fireworks in 2013. What a waste. Imagine how many school lunches we could buy with that money."

"Buck, my friend, it's entertainment -- pure and simple."

"Entertainment that kills and maims people, frequently kids. Also it damages and destroys property. Not to mention the damage it causes for animals and the environment. Many fireworks are manufactured in India and China by children.  The whole thing is insane."

"How altruistic of you."

"No one's ever accused me of being altruistic. It;s not altruism; it's a deep and abiding hatred of fireworks. It should be called what it is -- noise pollution.  The noise frightens children, pets, the autistic, and those suffering from battlefield stress issues. And not the least of which, fireworks deprive me of a good night's sleep because some idiots are shooting them off all night long."

When Sara brought our checks, she looked at Buck and said,  "I get such a bang out of you when you go ballistic."

Scrap the Cap on Soc

Social Security has been one of the pillars on which the US has developed a solid Middle Class; and now that the Middle Class is under attack, Social Security is also enduring an assault. Politicians and some of their media puppets (Fox News) insist on telling us Social Security will run out of money in the future.

Those who understand what has happened know that politicians like George W. Bush have raided the Social Security Trust Fund to invade Iraq and fight a war in Afghanistan. The bottom line is that The Social Security System is quite capable of supporting itself and caring for those retirees who have invested part of their wages in the system. If the system were a "locked box" as Al Gore in 2000 suggested, it would be self supporting.

The "Locked Box"
that was never locked

On the other hand, George W Bush raided the fund and now Republicans are asking workers to pay more and telling potential retirees to work longer than the promised retirement in order to make up for the money that politicians like GW Bush have removed. However, there is an opportunity to strengthen the system, but most politicians don't want to consider it -- raise the maximum  earnings level on which workers pay Social Security taxes.

At the present time the limit is $118,500. The result is that corporate executives making hundreds of million dollars a year pay Social Security taxes only on the first $118,500, There seems to be no logical reason for such a maximum. Why not tax all earnings?

Since 1983 a larger and larger share of earnings have escaped the Social Security tax. Then (1983) 90% of total earnings were taxed; today only 83% is taxed. 17% of total earnings is not being taxed. If the Social Security System needs additional revenue, eliminate the the maximum earnings limit. Tax all earnings equally.

The growing divide in wages in the US, means that since the top earners, millionaires and billionaires, contribute only on the first $118,500, many of them have already reached the max in February while the average wage earner will be paying the tax all year long. These average wage earners are also now in the unenviable position of seeing their wages decrease or stagnate while their productivity continues to increase.

Our seniors, both now and in the future, who pay into Social Security over their lifetimes should be "secure" in their retirement, and we can make that possible by having wealthy Americans pay their fair share.

A Modest Proposal: A Small Sales Tax for Wall St.

Congressman Chris Van Hollen

One of the few taxes that Republicans espouse is the sales tax. which creates a disproportionate burden on the lower middle class and the poor. GOP governors, like John Kasich in Ohio, continually try to lower the fair, graduated income tax while they raise or extend the sales tax to cover more services. That being the case,  one would logically conclude that Republicans would favor a sales tax on financial transactions. Not happening.

So surely the Democrats would be fighting tooth and nail to pass such legislation. Again, not happening.

Since a small Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) is such a simple, common sense approach to raise much-needed revenue and solve other problems, it is difficult to understand why there is not a groundswell of support. Perhaps the key is the word "financial." Few politicians, especially after Citizens United, want to incur the wrath of Wall Street and the Big Banks.

A tax on financial transactions is often referred to as a "Robin Hood Tax," in that the wealthy will be paying a larger proportion than the middle and lower classes.

Maryland congressman, Chris Van Hollen, proposed a program for a FTT similar to the one the European Union is installing next year. "It would tax stock trades at a rate of 0.1 percent (10 cents on $100) and trades of derivative at a rate of 0.01 percent (1 cent on $100). Extrapolating from a recent study of the revenue such a tax would raise in Europe, Van Hollen's tax would raise more than $130 billion a year or more than $1.5 trillion over the course of a decade."*

Vermont senator and democratic presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, introduced a bill in the Senate to offer a free public college education to all qualified Americans. As in Europe, this education plan would be paid for with a financial transaction tax.

Of course, those day-traders who make many trades a day will have an expense from which they have been exempt. But that may be a good thing. Those people may consider getting a real, constructive job. Or they will continue on as before and pay the toll.

But the bottom line is this: if a 50-week-a-year laborer has to pay sales tax when he purchases a pair of jeans for his son, why doesn't an investor have to pay a much lower tax when she or he buys a stock, not out of need, but out of greed.

And if you are going to tell me such a measure will shut down Wall Street, excuse me while I roll on the floor laughing.

*Deane Baker Nation of Change, May 11, 2015




,

USGA Plays Games with the US Open

Chambers Bay Golf Course

The United States Golf Association has an identity problem. These august ladies (I assume there are some token women involved) and gentlemen are attempting to make the US Open resemble the British Open.

Most Golfers in the United States play on courses with trees, meandering streams or lakes, and green fairways/greens; but the USGA has chosen to stage the US Open at Chambers Bay (a course built on a sand/gravel pit) with one tree, a busy railroad track, sprinkler heads in the middle of greens, the remains of old buildings, and dormant or dead grass on the undulating fairways and bumpy greens, described by one golfer as "putting on broccoli heads."

In addition the USGA has chosen  not only to make the course the longest in history, but also to change par 4s to  par 5s and vice versa from day to day  I can't imagine the United States Tennis Association changing the heights of the net from day to day in the US Open, or Major League Baseball changing the distance from the pitcher's mound to home plate in the World Series. Why does the USGA feel the need for these gimmicks?

Enough with the gimmicks, USGA. Don't game the game.

15th hole

Fox sports announcers keep referring to the course as "beautiful Chambers Bay," and I guess it is beautiful if you are into moonscapes and railroad container cars. The only hole I could possibly consider beautiful is the par 3 15th (length varies significantly from day to day) as it features the course's only tree and the viewers and golfers are looking out over Puget Sound.

This is not a course to which US golfers can relate. We all appreciate the British Open because it is played on typical British course. It's time the USGA  stops being gimmicky and plays the US Open on typical US courses.

The Attack Fom Within

 

The pages of history are cluttered with stories of collapsed empires, most recently, the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Although each story has unique factors, the one common element is that ultimately each empire collapsed, at least partially,  from within.

Many thoughtful people of today  seriously fear there is a political/ economic movement  afoot which, if successful, could be the beginning of the end for the United States. A strange collaboration of religious, conservative, libertarian, racist, egocentric and xenophobic perspectives has taken control of one of our major political parties. Although this movement represents a minority, it has managed to succeed because it has the support of extremely wealthy individuals and some major corporations and industries. And, as history has shown, a country, kingdom, or an empire can be subjugated by a well-connected minority. Whether such a reversal can occur in this country remains to be seen, but the Republican Party, so long as it kowtows to its radical right wing,  is in danger of destroying our country from within.

Consider the GOP's recent history. Begin with their rush to fight two unfunded wars in the Middle East. Couple that with a tax package that redistributes more of American wealth from the middle class to the extremely wealthy.

More recently this party has attempted to engage in activities that our fore fathers would have considered "Un-American" and definitely dangerous to our future. Listed below (in no particular order) are some of the initiatives the radical Republicans are attempting:

1.   selling off America's public lands to private corporations.
2.   destroying our great system of free public education.
3.   allowing corporations to pollute our air, water, and land.
4.   eliminating a safety net for the old and poor.
5.   bringing the US Congress to a standstill.
6.   fighting to keep out immigrants, especially those of color.
7.   telling our adversaries not to trust our President.
8.   decimating the contract between the government and those who pay into Social Security.
9.   giving control of public airwaves and broadband to monster communication corporations.
10. devising all sorts of ways to keep US citizens from voting.
11. defunding the scientific research that has made the US a world leader.
12. violating the First Amendment and the separation of church and state.
13. blocking federal judicial appointments, creating an historical number of vacancies.
14. idly watching the US become the "world leader"* in child poverty.
15. stacking the Supreme Court with political hacks.

16. shutting down the government.
17. conspiring with Israeli and Iranian extremists (cf. Iranian nuclear talks.)
18. taxing earned income from real work at a higher rate than investment income.
19.stigmatizing women who practice birth control.
20. presiding over the collapse of infrastructure in the name of deficit reduction.
21. underfunding and crippling the Internal Revenue Service.

These activities and/or attempted activities are not only detrimental to the long term success of a vibrant democracy, but are also subversive and seditious.

*among "developed countries."

Accountability for Legislators?

Legislators pass all kinds of laws to require accountability from public employees with teachers being the target most often. These legislators who are never required to show up for work receive 2 or 3 times the salary of a teacher or fireman. If they do show up for work, they are usually  "in session" less than half of the year.  Oh,yes, did I mention that they decide their own salaries. As for accountability, they do have to do the bidding of Big Oil or whoever is throwing money at them. A sad situation, but that has what has become of the dream of our Founding Fathers. Greed rules.

Although I realize legislators would never truthfully answer these questions, I propose asking them the following questions

1. Have you ever read the entire US Constitution including the Amendments? (You know, the document you swore to uphold when you took the oath of office)
2. If so, when did that occur?
3. If you can't read, when was the last time someone read it to you?
4. Do you realize that when you swore to uphold the US Con, you swore to "promote the general Welfare" of the citizens? No, the Founding Fathers were not evil "socialists." 
5. Do you understand that, in the First Amendment,  the Founding Fathers were trying to keep religion out of government and vice versa? Yes prayers are by nature religious.
6. Do you know the difference between faith and reason?
7. Do you realize that in exchange for your salary and all your perks, you are supposed to work on the country's business and not your next election?
8. Do you know that one of your jobs, according to the Constitution, is "To Promote the Progress of Science"? (Notice, it says "promote," not "hinder.")
9.Do you know that receiving $250,000 or more for voting in favor of the Keystone pipeline is corruption? (If you get off on that sort of thing, you should move to Russia. They are very good at it.).
10. Did it ever occur to you that lobbyists with their lucre and perks are not interested in promoting "the general Welfare"?
11. Do you support the  right to privacy as outlined in the Fourth Amendment? (Or do you support the George W. Bush version thereof?)
12. Did it ever occur to you that "Duck Dynasty" is not a great work of literature?

I realize legislators like John Boehner are laughing at these questions . He and his buddies like the game they and their lobbyists are playing. He knows that his country club memberships and a luxury vacation condo on Marco Island are not the result of promoting "the general Welfare,"  but of playing ball with the wealthy few.

One is left to wonder what level of Dante's Inferno these guys go to when they die. Readers of Dante will argue this point because they are eligible for various levels.

Lenten Sacrifices for Politicians

 

Ash Wednesday, the first day of Lent, that period of time during which Christians willing deprive themselves of things they desire, has arrived. Many of things we "give up" are also things whose absence will benefit our health and longevity, in other words, our "bad habits."

In addition to everyday bad habits, politicians, on the other hand, have a much larger accumulation of bad habits, and it is therefore much more difficult for them to decide what to "give up" for Lent. In the interest of doing my civic duty, I am going to assist some politicians by suggesting they do without the following:

• President Obama; give up basketball and concentrate on your golf game. Rich, white, guys really hate to see blacks playing golf and playing well.
• Vice President Joe Biden: try talking less and when doing so, don't use the f-word in front of an open microphone. Blue-collar workers like that , but the blondes on the Fox channel go into a tizzy when you do that.  So just stop it!
• Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell: stop taking money from your father-in-law, shipping magnate, James Chao. After all, the Koch brothers are paying you well to do their bidding.
• Speaker of the House John Boehner: although many have suggested you give up drinking, smoking, swearing, and tanning booths, I would suggest you give up meddling in the President's international negotiations and stop playing footsie with Benjamin Netanyahu.*

• Former President George W. Bush: although your family dreams of that "Dynasty" thing, give it up. Tell your brother Jeb that he is no more qualified to be president than you were.
• Former Vice President Dick Cheney: although you really enjoy your status as "Liar Extraordinaire," perhaps you could try telling the truth throughout this Lenten season.
•  Senator John McCain: give up your senate seat. There is no known cure for senility.



Ted Cruz

• Senator Rafael "Ted" Cruz: give up shutting down the government of the United States. Yes, we know you did it because "God told me to do it;" but it seems to me that shutting down our government is something a terrorist would be proud of.

• South Carolina State Senator Tom Corbin: maybe just for Lent you could shut your mouth and stop disrespecting women. Your last attempt to explain your misogyny by saying women are "a lesser cut of meat," did little to help.
• GOP Florida Senator Marco Rubio: for Lent you could start showing up for work. After you were found to be "the least likely to show up for work," it's time to at least act like you are earning your salary.
• New Jersey Governor Chris Christie: some would suggest the good governor go on a diet for Lent, I would suggest that he enroll in a crash course on "Ethics In Government."
• Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker: I know you admire Dick Cheney, but you have to stop telling lies. Unfortunately, you, like Pinocchio, get caught every time. 
• GOP wannabe president Rudy Giuliani: stop insisting your remarks are not racist. Your "explanations" simply confirm your racist attitudes.

Hopefully these politicians will appreciate my suggestions.

* In case John Boehner wonders what Americans think of his attempt to play politics with foreign policy, this is what they think:

*

Kasich's "Blueprint" is a Rehash of Old Failed GOP Policy

John Kasich

Ohio has not recovered from the Bush Recession as quickly as other states. Many workers cannot find jobs. Those who are working are finding their wages falling or remaining stagnant. Frequently, both parents of middle class families are working long hours just to maintain the statusquo. The number of Ohio children living in poverty is increasing. The gains and protections won by labor unions in the past are slowly being eroded.

But the other side of the coin is that Ohio's most wealthy citizens have never had it better. Their personal wealth, mostly inherited, is generating more and more return and being taxed less and less.

Given this situation, one would think the state's elected officials would, in 2015, change the course for the ship of state. Sorry. Not going to happen. Ohio's government is controlled by the GOP (Greedy Old Politicians) who are determined to consolidate the wealth.

Exhibit #1 is Governor Kasich's proposed 2015 budget which he touts as "Tax Reform." It is more of the same "trickle-down" economics that were proven to be fallacious when Ronald Reagan was selling back in the 80's. It didn't work then or when George W. Bush tried the same gimmick. And today Kasich is still trying to sell us that same piece of Marie Antoinette cake.

Just like one of his discredited predecessors, Bob Taft, Kasich wants to lower the income tax with the result that the wealthy pay less percentage-wise, and raise the sales tax so the middle class and poor pay disproportionately more.It takes a lot of guts to stand in front of Ohioans and promote this as "blueprint for a new Ohio," but then John Kasich has not backed off when it comes to making a fool of himself.

The GOP's deep-pocket donors have to love it, and Johnny is going to need those deep-pockets because he is posturing himself to run for the Republican nomination for president in 2016. Screw you, Ohioans, I want to be President of the United States! I need all that big money, now that the  Republican Supreme Court freed it up for me with the Citizens United decision.

Perhaps Kasich should rename his proposal for what it is: a blatant posturing to attract some of Romney's wealthy donors. After all, it costs a ton of money to run for president; and face it, those poor people can't give any money and if we play our cards like we did in 2004, we will keep them from voting.

The two key cogs of the proposed "Tax Reform" are:
■ 23 percent income tax cut across all brackets of the personal income tax
■ A half-cent hike in the state sales tax to 6.25 percent and expansion of the tax base to include such services as cable, lobbying, parking, public relations, travel packages, and debt collection. (Local sales taxes have to be added. In Lucas County the total will be 7.25 percent as of April)

In this case,  both Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives  have attacked the plan for a myriad of reasons, but the bottom line is that this strategy has been used repeatedly and it has always been a colossal failure. Most seem to agree that if this is the future of the "new Ohio," we are in for some tough times.

Lowering the income tax (a progressive tax -- the more income,the more you pay), and offsetting the lost income with an increase in the sales tax  (a regressive tax, the poorer one is, the larger percentage of one's income goes to taxes) has resulted in a series of economic recessions.


According to Policy Matters, “"Tax cuts would average $11,906 a year for the top 1 percent' of Ohio’s tax payers under Kasich’s proposed tax 'reform' plan.  'The bottom 60 percent, on average, would see increases” of up $116 a year.   In total, 80% of Ohioans would see zero change or a tax increase under Kasich’s proposed plan.'"

 Plunderbund agrees:  "Kasich wants to increase taxes on 60% of Ohioans."

As all economic studies have indicated, cutting income taxes and raising sales taxes moves more wealth from the lower economic levels to the most wealthy. And the most wealthy, according to Standards and Poor, "tend to save a greater share of their income and spend it on untaxed services."

The concentration of wealth caused by shifting the tax burden from income tax to sales tax results in a decline of the annual average state revenue growth.  In the 10 most sales-tax dependent states, there has been a "significant"decline in the annual average state tax growth."


And the ordinary consumer realizes that  increasing the sales tax penalizes consumerism, which in turn has ill effects for manufacturing. I  was thinking about purchasing a new truck or new household appliances, but if I have to pay even higher sales tax, I will make do with the ones I have.

As Policy Matters reminds us:  “cutting the income tax and expanding the existing tax break for business income is a failed economic strategy; after 10 years of tax cuts, Ohio still has fewer jobs than it had in 2005, while the nation has gained 6 million.”

One has to wonder why these  presidential wanna-bes, like Kasich, are bogged down in the failed Reaganomics of the early eighties. If it didn't work then, it's not going to work now.  As a wise woman I know says: "Repeating the same failed action over and over and expecting a different outcome is the epitome of stupidity."

Ohioans deserve a more creative policy. And that may mean we deserve new policy makers. 

Take a Closer Look at For-profit Charter Schools

Universal Public Education; Basis of Democracy

In the process of gathering  background information for a blog about charter schools, I happened upon the following letter written by Dr. Jan L. Osborn, superintendent of Putnam County (Ohio) Schools. He is responding to an editorial in The Lima  News (1/25/15). In the interest of brevity his letter does not give the full picture of how dysfunctional so many of Ohio's charter schools are,  but it does remind us of how well "free" universal public education has and is serving this country. Thus, I share:
 
After reading Thomas Lucente’s Jan. 25 column (“Separate school from state”), the superintendents of Putnam County feel compelled to write a response in order to present a more accurate picture regarding school choice in Ohio as well as to draw some comparisons to our state’s public school systems.

Some school options Mr. Lucente mentioned in the article have been around for decades, such as parochial/private schools and homeschooling. He also referred to more recent options, such as interschool choice and magnet schools within the public school system. And yes, publicly funded brick and mortar and online charter schools are now an option. Mr. Lucente states “we” are headed in the right direction in terms of these many choices for students today.

 
Some other facts would be beneficial to know before we consider, as Mr. Lucente suggests, that government be the last option in how we educate our children. Consider the following:

America’s public education system is based on the premise of the U.S. Constitution. It is a critical component to an informed, democratic society and the American way of life. Public schools do not discriminate; public schools serve all students regardless of background, class or ability. A privatized, market-based education system would essentially eliminate this long-held belief of our country.

Using public tax dollars to allow students and their families the opportunity to choose their method of education is already common in our state. For example, students may attend brick and mortar or online charter schools, which have been around for over a decade. It should also be noted that these schools have had minimal oversight, although public tax dollars are being used to fund them, and various problems have been publicized. They include the following:

• The improper use of funds to create large leasing contracts for property. One prime example is the Imagine Columbus Primary Academy, a charter school of 155 students, which paid an Imagine subsidiary $700,000 a year to lease the building which housed its students. The rent alone consumed over half the school’s annual budget.

• Hundreds of thousands of public taxpayer dollars being used to market and advertise charter schools. A northeastern Ohio online charter school of 1,200 students spent over $185,000 in marketing in clever radio and TV ads. This taxpayer money is appropriated for public education but is used instead for public relations and student recruitment.

• The amount of funds given to our elected politicians from the CEOs of these Ohio charter schools. White Hat Management, the largest charter school management in Ohio, is headed by David Brennan. From 2001-2010, he and his family donated nearly $3 million dollars to candidates running for public office in Ohio.

• The poor academic record for Ohio charter schools. An analysis by Innovation Ohio shows that charter schools received more Fs than As, Bs, and Cs combined in this past year’s state report card.

 

Mr. Lucente’s piece is clearly an overgeneralization of public schools and shortchanges the endless daily positives occurring throughout Ohio public schools. Not only are our public students reaching unprecedented heights of achievement, they are doing so despite the mountain of legislative initiatives that are overtaking public education.

Dr. Jan L Osborn

Did you know:

• Year after year, public schools across Ohio are among the best in the country, earning national recognition, landing on prestigious awards lists and showcasing models of innovation, efficiency and achievement.

• Ohio public school students continue to outperform the nation on college entrance and placement exams.

• Ohio has nearly 50 dedicated career and technology centers, which provide students cutting-edge skills in vocational training.

• U.S. students are improving dramatically in math. Since 1990, American fourth-graders have gained 28 points and eighth-graders have gained 21 points on the math portion of the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

• U.S. high schools are more rigorous than ever. In 1990, less than a third of American high school seniors had a core curriculum that included math through at least Algebra II and three science labs. By 2009, that number was 59 percent.

In addition to student academic success, most public school districts throughout our state are the hubs of the communities.

 

Visit a football stadium on a fall Friday night or take in a basketball game in the winter.

 

 Read the many public-school related articles commonly written in your own newspaper, which share stories of student bodies hosting fundraisers for many worthwhile civic and community events, such as Relay for Life, Common Goal Hope Survives, etc. This is not to mention how multiple districts rally around one of their own families time and again in a time of hardship.

Public schools, the people within those respective districts and the various life events that bring them together, serve to educate the young people in real-life lessons on selflessness, sacrifice and a belief in the greater good. Through this collective effort each school and community fosters a unique and enduring sense of identity and pride.

Mr. Lucente suggests it is time to try something new yet fails to recognize that alternative schooling options have been around for decades. Further, he makes the statement that government should be the last option in how we educate our children, which is a dangerous one particularly considering the aforementioned public school facts.

Time to try something new? Be careful for what you wish.

The superintendents of the public schools in Putnam County signed this column, including Don Horstman, of Ottawa-Glandorf; Kerry Johnson, of Miller City-New Cleveland; Karl Lammers, of Kalida; Nick Langhals, of Jennings; Scott Mangas, of Ottoville; Joel Mengerink, of Continental; R. Todd Schmutz, of Pandora-Gilboa; Nick Verhoff, of Columbus Grove; Greg Williamson, of Leipsic; and Jan Osborn, of Putnam County Educational Service Center.

 

 

 

NFL: America's Taxpayer-financed Religion?

Minnesota Vikings Home: Cathedral or Stadium?

After last week  examining the ways in which government in the US subsidizes religion, this week let's examine one of our most prosperous "religions." It raises more than 10 billion dollars a year and cajoles governments to provide billion-dollar "cathedrals" which remain empty most of the time. It then demands that local government retrofit these places of worship with "altars" which cost $10 million. Its "high priest," Roger Goodell,  has an annual salary of at least $44 million.

That's right. I'm speaking of the National Football League which celebrates it's highest holy day Sunday with Super Bowl XLIX. (Don't you love the pretension of using Roman Numerals?)

Like most Americans, I love football, and the NFL has done a great job of marketing its product. So if the league, its executives, the team owners, coaches and players are making tons of money, what's the problem?

There are two problems: 1) the NFL is permitted to operate as a monopoly, but more importantly 2) it is tax exempt.

Roger Goodell

 Perhaps we can ignore the monopoly issue since the government permits many other entities to function as monopolies. But the tax exempt status makes no sense. It is impossible to consider the NFL as a charity that takes in donations, yet it is classified as a 501 (c) (6), the same as churches and social justice agencies which give back to the community. However, Roger Goodell, the NFL commissioner with his $44 million plus salary, has the audacity, invoking the first amendment, to explain it this way: 

“Football is a sacred sport in here. It’s a religion. People have dedicated a lot of time and money to make this work for all the fans. The fans who worship the game, the players, and treat the stadiums like houses of worship. I mean, look at the Vikings' new stadium plans, the place looks like a church… because it is. And that’s why we must continue to receive tax exempt status. It’s against the first amendment to tell people they are wrong regarding who they worship, and football fans worship football. The coaches are our church leaders and pastors, the owners and management are our trustees and deacons, and the ushers are, well, the ushers.” (Free Wood Press)

Please, Roger. The NFL is all about making a profit and trying to protect its image. For years it has tried to cover up the problem of domestic violence, the long-range effects of players' concussions, HGH abuse, and paying cheerleaders $2.85 an hour (amount Cincinnati owner Paul Brown paid Alexa Brenneman). Hardly the approach of a caring religious institution.

And then there is the issue of  billions of taxpayer dollars being used to build  NFL stadiums. In Arlington, Texas, when the Dallas Cowboys owner wanted to build a new $1.2 billion "cathedral," he asked  the local tax payers to cough up $325 million. In addition, the  taxpayers are expected to pay 70% of the maintenance and upkeep. Of course, the owner, Jerry Jones, keeps all the profits.

"The worst stadium financing deal ever..." according to The Wall Street Journal  occurred in Cincinnati. In the mid 1990's, Paul Brown, the Bengal owner, threatened to move the team unless Hamilton County built and financed a football-only stadium. Hamilton county by itself, with no help from surrounding counties in Ohio and Kentucky, built the stadium and named it after the extortionistic owner. While the Bengals rake in the profits, the county maintains the stadium. In 2011 (10 years later) the stadium costs made up 16.4% of the county budget. (Business Insider,7/12/11) One local official called the stadium "the monster that ate the public sector." Meanwhile, the residents of Hamilton County pay an extra 1/2 cent sales tax to finance Paul Brown's cathedral

And that's not the end. In a game of mine-is-bigger-than-yours, Paul Brown wants a a $10 million stadium scoreboard for next season, and of course wants the county to pay $7.5 million of the cost. Hamilton County agreed. Talk about welfare for the wealthy!

 Louisiana, with a conservative GOP governor, Bobby Jindal,  pays the owner of the Saints up to $6 million of tax payers' money a year  as an "inducement payment" to keep the owner, Tom Benson,  from thinking about moving the team out of the state.

In Seattle, the Seahawks' CenturyLink Field was built in 2002 at a cost of $560 million of which the residents of Washington paid $360 million. Paul Allen, the owner and one of the world's richest people, pays the state $1 million a year rent and in return he keeps all profits, estimated to be in excess of $200 million - not a bad deal, if you can get it



Since Goodell thinks his stadiums are churches, it might be interesting to compare the two. Most churches are used every day of the week, or at least every Sunday.  Most stadiums have eight or fewer NFL games a year. If public schools operated on the same basis, there would be a public outcry, but we are all too willing to give the NFL a free pass.

After all, the NFL is America's religion,  and tonight when two of America's most disliked teams, the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots, play in Super Bowl  XLIX, I will be there in the pew in front of my television to watch the 11 minutes of actual football plays in a 60 minute game which will require 5 hours of my time. Unfortunately, if I had lived in ancient Rome, I suspect I would have gone to the coliseum to watch the gladiators.

(If you wish to verify the above, the most comprehensive source is: "How the NFL Fleeces Taxpayers," The Atlantic, October 2013.) 


…